Why Fox got thrown in front of a train

emissary · Post by **emissary** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 2:16 am

There was no chemistry between Fox and Mercy. Â Warchief Walter decided that Swan would get the love interest, therefore cutting Mr. Waites lines tremendously.

Riff · Post by **Riff** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 7:53 am

Watching it now, its hard to believe that Fox would have ever got it on with Mercy. Swan always seemed like the natural choice.

King · Post by **King** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 4:02 pm

u mean there was no chemistry between fox in mercy in real life or da movie?

Post by **The Fox** » Fri Oct 14, 2005 5:10 pm

Both i think. I think it worked better with Swan and Mercy.

skt4477 · Post by **skt4477** » Tue Oct 18, 2005 10:43 am

Swan was more of a main character so it made more sense that he and Mercy hooked up.

emissary · Post by **emissary** » Wed Oct 19, 2005 9:29 pm

Swan was a main character after the script was changed. Vermin could have been a main character if it was written and directed that way. But I'm glad Sir Walter did what he did.

da-warrior · Post by **da-warrior** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:46 am

definately no chemistry with fox/mercy ,all the way through the movie fox looks like hes carrying a chip on his shoulder now we know why

emissary · Post by **emissary** » Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:07 pm

I don't know, this is a tough one.

da-warrior · Post by **da-warrior** » Fri Oct 21, 2005 7:36 am

emissary wrote:Be careful Da-Warrior, while I agree with you 100%, there are those around here who defend Fox like a Riff would defend Cyrus.

nothing against him man i love all the warriors in one way or another

,i just think he looks upset in the movie like he doesnt wanna be involved ,until i saw the directors cut featurettes i didnt know that fox was meant to have more of a role in the movie so it brought to light the fact he looks unhappy to me ,sorry if ive offended the fox fans out there 8)