the orphans
the orphans
the thing i dont get in the movie is why did the warriors run from the orphans i mean there the lowest gang so what if its 30 on 8 even fox and rembrant would have taken out at least 3 each.
the warriors fought the furies and the punks 2 of the heaviest gangs and they run from the orphans?
the warriors fought the furies and the punks 2 of the heaviest gangs and they run from the orphans?
We're gonna make it back. We came this far and we're gonna make it the rest of the way!
Re: the orphans
lol i agree but vermin says "hey why we running" and they dont want to get wrecked or fight they just want to go home
:P
Re: the orphans
but then why did they fight the punks? i understand that they fought the furies cause cowboy couldnt run anymore but why the punks? (if i was in the warriors i would have wrecked every orphan to get our rep up)
We're gonna make it back. We came this far and we're gonna make it the rest of the way!
Re: the orphans
I think there were just too many orphans to mess with. The Warriors saw a bunch but they didn't know if there were more so they threw the Molotov to cover splitting. The Punks at least were a certain known number of enemies that they figured they could handle. Even if the Orphans were lame there was just an unklnown number of them to mess with.
[img]http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a15/Twitch98/greetings.jpg[/img]
- SoldierHeavyMuscle
- Moderator
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:02 pm
- Location: Chi-Town!!
- Contact:
Re: the orphans
30 bodies, are still 30 bodies!!!cleon24 wrote: the thing i dont get in the movie is why did the warriors run from the orphans i mean there the lowest gang so what if its 30 on 8 even fox and rembrant would have taken out at least 3 each.
the warriors fought the furies and the punks 2 of the heaviest gangs and they run from the orphans?
and it's still a lot more than 8 bodies!!Â

Tried to give the devil my soul...
She said i had nothing to bargain with...
She said i had nothing to bargain with...
- The Warriors 9
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 478
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2005 2:26 pm
- Location: USSA
Re: the orphans
4 to one odds are pretty hard to beat even for the Warriors vs the Orphans. Am a huge Orphans fan so I'm glad you cut em a little slack SHMSHM wrote:30 bodies, are still 30 bodies!!!cleon24 wrote: the thing i dont get in the movie is why did the warriors run from the orphans i mean there the lowest gang so what if its 30 on 8 even fox and rembrant would have taken out at least 3 each.
the warriors fought the furies and the punks 2 of the heaviest gangs and they run from the orphans?
and it's still a lot more than 8 bodies!!Â![]()



Worlds 2nd biggest Orphans Fan.
- SoldierHeavyMuscle
- Moderator
- Posts: 2143
- Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:02 pm
- Location: Chi-Town!!
- Contact:
Re: the orphans
LOLThe Warriors 9 wrote:4 to one odds are pretty hard to beat even for the Warriors vs the Orphans. Am a huge Orphans fan so I'm glad you cut em a little slack SHMSHM wrote:30 bodies, are still 30 bodies!!!cleon24 wrote: the thing i dont get in the movie is why did the warriors run from the orphans i mean there the lowest gang so what if its 30 on 8 even fox and rembrant would have taken out at least 3 each.
the warriors fought the furies and the punks 2 of the heaviest gangs and they run from the orphans?
and it's still a lot more than 8 bodies!!Â![]()
or I think you did.
![]()
![]()
well, yes, and no!
we always learned bring everybody you can, in that sort of situation!
a body, is a body!!!
even if it's not a "tuff" body!
it's still a "body" to contend with, and it occupies an enemy "body"
so to speak!
as far as numbers were concerned, the orphans shoulda been able to take the warriors.
they had the greatest "number" advantage of any of the gangs the warriors came in contact with, except for maybe the turnbulls!
Tried to give the devil my soul...
She said i had nothing to bargain with...
She said i had nothing to bargain with...
-
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 964
- Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 11:27 pm
- Location: Scotland
Re: the orphans
You couldnt be more right! Even if they are wimps ,if theres 30 wimps against 8 good brawlers you're pretty much done for. Please trust me on this, I've had first hand experience about this.There wasnt 8 of us and thirty of them but kinda the same comparison. I dont really want to get into it but lets just say.  me,friends,outnumbered by wimps= very bad beating from wimpsSHM wrote:30 bodies, are still 30 bodies!!!cleon24 wrote: the thing i dont get in the movie is why did the warriors run from the orphans i mean there the lowest gang so what if its 30 on 8 even fox and rembrant would have taken out at least 3 each.
the warriors fought the furies and the punks 2 of the heaviest gangs and they run from the orphans?
and it's still a lot more than 8 bodies!!Â![]()
[img]http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c238/stevend06/resiz1.jpg[/img]
[img]http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c238/stevend06/Untitled-2.gif[/img]
"Those were some desperatre dudes! Hey...so was we!!"
"I had sex last night....WITH A GIRL!!!!"
[img]http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c238/stevend06/Untitled-2.gif[/img]
"Those were some desperatre dudes! Hey...so was we!!"
"I had sex last night....WITH A GIRL!!!!"
Re: the orphans
Yeah and lets not forget that The Orphans were packed , razors, chains 30 dudes....yeah you better run buddy 

Re: the orphans
Plus I don't think the Furies or the Punks were really planning to let them go anywhere without a rumble. The Furies chased them for a couple of blocks and the Punks pretty much backed them into a corner.
Re: the orphans
I see what you mean but i don't agree that the Punks backed them into a corner . The way i see it the Warriors lured them in when the numbers were equal and did to them what they did best , just my opinion.Ace wrote: Plus I don't think the Furies or the Punks were really planning to let them go anywhere without a rumble. The Furies chased them for a couple of blocks and the Punks pretty much backed them into a corner.
Re: the orphans
That's a good point, JD. I see where you're coming from.JD wrote:I see what you mean but i don't agree that the Punks backed them into a corner . The way i see it the Warriors lured them in when the numbers were equal and did to them what they did best , just my opinion.Ace wrote: Plus I don't think the Furies or the Punks were really planning to let them go anywhere without a rumble. The Furies chased them for a couple of blocks and the Punks pretty much backed them into a corner.
Re: the orphans
thers just too many of them!
Re: the orphans
They had no choice but to fight the furies and the punks, the orphans however they didnt need to fight, and were not worth the time. If anything news that the warriors beat the orphans down would make other gangs laugh.
Bop or be bopped.
- wolverine_95
- Rank: Savage Hun
- Posts: 84
- Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:36 am
- Location: Washington, harD City
- Contact:
Re: the orphans
The Orphans not only outnumbered them, but The Warriors were on unfamiliar territory. They fought The Furies out of neccessity and they were able to lure The Punks into manageable suroundings.
[align=center][img]http://static.flickr.com/55/137967009_693820d686_o.jpg[/img][/align][align=center]My mountain bike's name is Heavy Muscle[/align]