Why didnt they take their colours off??

Leave your comments and messages about the 1979 cult movie.
User avatar
Mercy08
Rank: Van Cortlandt Ranger
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 12:40 am
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba

Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Mercy08 »

I was wondering why they wouldnt just take their colours off?? I know that when they were going thru the Orphans territory they said that its not who they are ect. but they  probably would of all made it (except for cleon) so why not. Would you rather die than take your colours off?

User avatar
Storm86
Scout
Scout
Posts: 1232
Joined: Thu Aug 25, 2005 11:28 pm
Location: Big Clifty,Ky

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Storm86 »

I think it was foolish pride. I never understood did the orphans leader mean for them to take their vests off and leave them there because Mercy wanted one, or just take them off and carry them witht them.
[img]http://www.duallegacy.com/toon/linkfile/warriors/storm.jpg[/img]

CleonWarlord
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 441
Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2006 3:07 am
Location: ghdgfg

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by CleonWarlord »

Well, The Warriors are a heavier set than the Orphans and the Warriors don't wuss out. Besides, it wouldn't look good on the Warriors rep if they wussed out for some low class Orphans. ;)

User avatar
goin_CRAZY
Rank: Turnbull AC
Posts: 118
Joined: Sun Jun 18, 2006 2:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania
Contact:

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by goin_CRAZY »

/discussion
THS IS 2 BIG RESIZE IT TO THE CURRENT SIG RULES

User avatar
Mercy
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 405
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 8:46 pm
Contact:

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Mercy »

I dont think the movie would have been the same, without the vests, you know?
they meet the orphans very early in the story. Every single costume is very important in the movie, can u imagine, the most important gang, without their colours?
[img]http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i4/MikeySHM/mercyuserbar.jpg[/img]

http://world5.monstersgame.co.uk/?ac=vid&vid=59143454

User avatar
SoldierHeavyMuscle
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 2143
Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Chi-Town!!
Contact:

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by SoldierHeavyMuscle »

Mercy08 wrote: I was wondering why they wouldnt just take their colours off?? I know that when they were going thru the Orphans territory they said that its not who they are ect. but they? probably would of all made it (except for cleon) so why not. Would you rather die than take your colours off?
what did you just say?????? :x :evil:
i didnt just hear, what i thought i just heard!!

DID I?????

BLASPHEMY!!!!! :evil:

son of a......... :p :p :D ;)


LOLOLOLOLOL
Tried to give the devil my soul...
She said i had nothing to bargain with...

User avatar
KillerMime
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 339
Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2005 10:28 pm
Location: Atlanta

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by KillerMime »

Storm86 wrote: I think it was foolish pride. I never understood did the orphans leader mean for them to take their vests off and leave them there because Mercy wanted one, or just take them off and carry them witht them.
I'm pretty sure Sully just wanted them to take the vests off, walk away as civilians and take their colors with them.

But as Warriors, that ain't no option.  Live as a warrior, die as a warrior.  Word would get out on the network fast that the warriors dumped their colors in order to scamper on home.  Then Masai would never say to them "You Warriors are good, real good."

And, oh yeah, you wouldn't have a movie.
[img]http://i55.photobucket.com/albums/g145/crypto17/ohs07.jpg[/img]

User avatar
back2coney
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 680
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:33 pm
Location: London

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by back2coney »

SHM wrote:
Mercy08 wrote: I was wondering why they wouldnt just take their colours off?? I know that when they were going thru the Orphans territory they said that its not who they are ect. but they? probably would of all made it (except for cleon) so why not. Would you rather die than take your colours off?
what did you just say?????? :x :evil:
i didnt just hear, what i thought i just heard!!

DID I?????

BLASPHEMY!!!!! :evil:

son of a......... :p :p :D ;)


LOLOLOLOLOL
Well said, these guys were hard mothers - they're not gonna take their colours off for nobody, you wear them with pride if you're a Warriors....wouldn't you - you may not make it to warrior if you don't have that passion.
" Real tough mothers ain't ya! "


[img]http://looksy.co.uk/files/images/rare22_1_0.jpg[/img]

User avatar
Oxygen
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 710
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 2:21 am
Contact:

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Oxygen »

Its disrespect to your gang if you did take your colours off.There a gang,they would die before there vests left their backs
Last edited by Anonymous on Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
We're gonna make it back. We came this far and we're gonna make it the rest of the way!

User avatar
LIPPY
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 445
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 4:35 pm
Location: Essex

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by LIPPY »

Even if I'd have run into the Orphans all by myself, I'd rather be stomped into the ground a Warrior, than walk down the street a civilian...
Hold your tongue...

User avatar
Jesse
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 267
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2006 10:53 pm
Location: Bayonne NJ
Contact:

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Jesse »

It's all about gang pride! taking yer colors off would show that you dont show pride in yer gang. The Warriors would have to take off their vests and hold em in their hands or tie it around their waste er whatever and walk through as civilians. Now why should they do that!?!?! the Orphans leader told them to take their colors off to see what theyre dealin with... if they took off their colors the orphans would have nu'n to worry about... but if the Warriors didnt the Orphans would know that their dealin with Hardcore soldiers... literally...notice how worried the Orphans leader was... he hesitated wether he should come down on them! mercy had barely anything to with this particular situation! there you go :D!
i told you theyre a buncha wimps! :D!
...Miracles is the way things ought to be.

User avatar
Lion
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3172
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:20 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Lion »

I am sure the Orphans would of bragged about it later on, Swan knew this. By taken them off, the Warriors would show an act of submission, which on the streets it would be considered humiliation. They just stuck to their guns and well, the "F---k You" follows!
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]

User avatar
Kujo_87
Rank: Riff
Posts: 214
Joined: Thu May 18, 2006 1:09 am
Location: Central Texas

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Kujo_87 »

Scurvy Dog wrote: They earned those colors. It's who they are. To dump their colors would mean they were denying who they were to another gang, and would not be an option.

On another note, is it EVER acceptable to dump one's colors? For example, like when sending a scout into enemy turf - would it be acceptable for him to not wear his colors during that mission so he could blend in to check things out? Or should he be expected to wear his colors just the same, and lay low?
I don't think so, especially since the scout would probably take too much pride in them. Nowadays, disrespecting your colors would get you jumped out of the gang, especially taking them off for a weak set like the Orphans or anyone else for that matter, and we all know the Warriors are too heavy for that. I mean, if they didn't take them of to avoid the ACs or the cops, then they're not taking them off for anyone.

To qoute Scarface (the rapper) "you either ruff ride, ride ruff, or roll over" 8)
[img]http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/8223/sig22ih.png[/img]
                         GO GET IT

User avatar
Mercy08
Rank: Van Cortlandt Ranger
Posts: 73
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 12:40 am
Location: Winnipeg Manitoba

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by Mercy08 »

I didnt just mean to take them off for the orphans... i meant take them off all in all so the cops wont get them (maybe Ajax) the other gangs wouldnt recognise them. But my question was still answered, Thanks!

User avatar
doyle
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 316
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 2:07 pm
Location: Terracina (LT) - Lazio
Contact:

Re: Why didnt they take their colours off??

Post by doyle »

If you are a member of a gang, you can't do it! You Must defend your gang name & rep!!! If someone wants your vest he must conquer it, it's not a gift or a souvenir.
[url=http://www.marconelweb.it/thewarriors1979][img]http://www.marconelweb.it/imgForum/modern_doyle.jpg[/img][/url]

Post Reply