Update? NNNNOOOOOOO!!

[Ben]

I have yet to see a descent Tony Scott film, so that doesn't help. 

Guess you've never seen True Romance then..

[back2coney]

Look people, if this is a hoax or not we all know the remake is going to be utter tosh anyway!

This review is pretty much how I imagine the remake to be, an updated version which reflects just how sad a  bling-bling world we live in. It's a sad fact that this modern world is far more false then ever before, the film is unfortunately going to reveal this. This is why I'm not often found in the 2008 section, cause it's going to be rubbish!

[LIPPY]

Look people, if this is a hoax or not we all know the remake is going to be utter tosh anyway!

This review is pretty much how I imagine the remake to be, an updated version which reflects just how sad a  bling-bling world we live in. It's a sad fact that this modern world is far more false then ever before, the film is unfortunately going to reveal this. This is why I'm not often found in the 2008 section, cause it's going to be rubbish!

Absolutely agreed 100%.

'Sad bling-bling world'  . Imagine all that jewelry that's gonna be at the big meeting in this new movie. "We got the 'Gold Fronts' right by the 'Van Courtland Rolex's'!"

A bit off topic, but what's even more funny about the world today is the fact that the more faker and false it gets, the more it expects us to take it seriously.

[phillip]

fuck you

[the wigan warrior]

I have yet to see a descent Tony Scott film, so that doesn't help. 

Guess you've never seen True Romance then..

Has that got Arnie in it???? if it has I Have seen it, It was good but i can't imagine him doing the Warriors.

[back2coney]

[bad word deleted] you

To put my previous comment simply (a back2coney guide for dummies) there is a difference between gang and gangster - this is what Tony Scott has missed.

If you have a problem with a comment I gave, or the valid follow up from Lippy - then I welcome a good verbal challenge.........not a bad one.

[LIPPY]

[bad word deleted] you

To put my previous comment simply (a back2coney guide for dummies) there is a difference between gang and gangster - this is what Tony Scott has missed.

If you have a problem with a comment I gave, or the valid follow up from Lippy - then I welcome a good verbal challenge.........not a bad one.

Hmmm. I don't think he's capable. I got an idea though...

*LIPPY throws a virtual right hook, hitting phillip in his virtual big mouth, virtually knocking him out.*

[Lion]

Bye Phillip!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin: :badgrin:

[alexfugazi]

Has that got Arnie in it???? if it has I Have seen it, It was good but i can't imagine him doing the Warriors.

Nah, you're thinking of True Lies.  True Romance is a REALLY GOOD Quentin Tarantino written film starring Christian Slater at his best.  A DAMN good flick.

And Tony Scott has made some good movies other than True Romance...Top Gun is loads of fun, even though it doesn't stand up to the test of time.

But I do believe that this Warriors flick is gonna blow goats.  Big, sexy goats.

[Ben]

As much I suspect that the re-make will be utter trash I think there are far worse choices for director.  Tony Scott is pretty damn good at what he does I just think the entire project is misguided.