Page 1 of 2

A sequel

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:37 pm
by justin
I think they should have a remake and a sequel.

justins post

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2004 9:57 pm
by ajax
a sequal speaks for its self,by remake do you mean a copy or 2004 version

A sequel

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:08 am
by snowball fury
Well a sequeal wouldn't be the same without Rembrandt but what ideas did you have for 1. Maybe the Warriors get lots more members and become a really big gang like the Riffs.

A sequel

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:28 am
by Rembrandt
They should leave the movie as it is!

A sequel

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:44 am
by snowball fury
I agree with you Rembrandt. I am a little curious though about the remake.

A sequel

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:47 am
by Rembrandt
I'm not very interested in the remake!

A sequel

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 2:38 am
by Hippy
Rembrandt wrote:I'm not very interested in the remake!
I agree with you infact one of the rumors is that they are going to replace the sacred Vests with some crappy a$$ed jackets with skulls on them.

If they are going to make a sequel have new charecters instead and it would take place in the 1979's after incident in The Bronx and show how they fight and what not.

A sequel

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 3:23 am
by wonderwheel
Rembrandt wrote:They should leave the movie as it is!
Yup, I too agree with that statement; just leave it alone, and do not mess with it. A sequel may dilute the impact of the original.

adios,

A sequel

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2004 11:02 am
by The Fox
The further removed from the Original the better!

A sequel

Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:02 am
by Rembrandt
The further removed from the Original the better!
Why is that! :?

A sequel

Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 9:46 am
by wonderwheel
I think the further it is from the original the less likely the sequel would be compared to the original. And if it does bomb, this will have less of an effect on the original as well. I'm not too big on sequels, very little truly have lasting value, the storyline is usually less unique and it more than likely uses on the popularity of the first release.

adios,

A sequel

Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:24 am
by The Fox
Rembrandt wrote:
The further removed from the Original the better!
Why is that! :?
I would just like the Original to be unique and really don't want the remake to taint the original.

I don't mind a film that inspires The Warriors but, not an out and out remake.

A sequel

Posted: Thu Sep 09, 2004 8:33 pm
by Swan
Just go to the movies and act like its a whole new movie and got nothing to do with the warriors

A sequel

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 2:43 am
by snowball fury
When this remake comes out I hope it's like Terminator 2. Atleast then the second will then match up to the first.

A sequel

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2004 6:38 am
by Rembrandt
Is there a sequel?