The Warriors Movie Site Forum

I was just thinking, it would be better if they made a sequel. It wouldn't ruin the originality and i don't know, the feel of the original. It just occured to me they'd have to get the same actors, but they could do like 25 years or so after the Cleon generation? I don't know just a stupid thought, too late now.

They could call it Warriors Reunited.

haha nice, it could also be called "This is a huge mistake"..........

I think it is a bit too late for a sequel now. A sequel will make the story really go out of hand, unless Walter Hill was to make it.

yeah i know i was just wondering what you guys thought about it.

i would have rather it been a sequel than the remake

ditto it wouldn't be as associable as the original

Yeah a sequel would not be a good idea - Just like all them other sequels that went wrong: Grease 2 ( ) The Exorcist ( ) Scream ( ) I could go on...
But you get the picture!

Sequels usually aren't good. Only a select few managed to be good ( Terminator 2, Back to the Future 2, X-Men 2). But with all the actors being so much older it wouldn't work.

P.S. Saw Blade Trinity yesturday. James Remar is still dope.

uhh...sequels rock!!!! anyone ever heard of a little flick called crocodile dundee 2!!!!!

which character is James Remar? The old guy?

Well lets just hope they don't. A sequel always sucks when it is copyed from a old movie. If this one turns out good then they might ruin it by making another.

I would rather see a re-make than a sequal... and i Dont wanna see this re-make.

i just hope they can release a special edition 2 pack when the remake hits dvd

Cyrus wrote:which character is James Remar? The old guy?

James Remar plays the FBI guy. Great to see him still working!!