Page 1 of 1

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Wed Dec 15, 2004 2:41 am
by Crash Overide9207
I was wondering, if the remake has a sequel that explains what happens to some of the character's disappearances (Ajax being arrested, Fox and Cleon dying). You know, what if they make a sequel to the remake if the cult classic becomes a franchise (Action figures, Soundtrack, Video Game). Should a sequel exist even if the remake does well at the box office? Please vote in the poll to voice your opinion.

Example: "Die Hard" is an example how sequels to the basis of the cult classic film works and how sequels are made for the sequel of the remake. For those of you who don't know about the Die Hard Lineage, Roderick Thorp (The Mastermind of "Nothing Lasts forever" and the Die Hard series) Written "The Detective" which was the original which turned into a film starring Frank Sinatra as Joe Leland. Die Hard is supposedly the sequel to the film but as John McClane and this film made lots of $$$ at the box office and spawned sequels due to it's success (Die Hard 2: Die Harder and Die Hard 3: With A Vengance). So, if we follow this example, if the remake is a hit, should it deserve a sequel? (Note: Sol Yurick is still alive, he might be willing to approve of the idea.)

Now, sorry for rambling, but I tried to explain this to the best of my ability, if something needs clarification, don't hesitate to post and I will clear things up for you. Thanx for your time.

C Ya! :wink:

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Thu Dec 16, 2004 9:24 pm
by warriorchick
this is a tough question. i guess that would have to depend on a lot of things

trilogy!!!!!

Posted: Wed Dec 22, 2004 7:12 am
by cepter
Hell, we shouldn't even HAVE to bear witness to a remake! :?

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Fri Jan 21, 2005 11:40 pm
by AjaxHasABigSwan
I vote #3: "There shouldn't even be a remake at all" :shock:

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:23 am
by tomboy
Only if the movie was seriously good and have a need for it. I can't see that happening though

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:42 am
by SoldierHeavyMuscle
i think we are getting way ahead of ourselves here, let's worry about wether or not the remake is even tolerable. :wink:

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2005 11:33 am
by Irishfan
Yeah wait until ya see the remake before making your mind up as whether it deserves a sequel or not.

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 4:03 pm
by BTW A.K.A the killer household appliance
the original deserves a sequel!although its kinda too late to bring in the original actors.

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Sun May 22, 2005 4:05 pm
by The Fox
please read your messages.

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:21 pm
by I SHOT CYRUS
The Original Should Had A Sequel, Back Then,
The Wa*k£rs Who Are Trying To Remake It Dont Deserve Anything :evil: :twisted:

Should the remake deserves a sequel?

Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 3:05 pm
by Oddity
I put yes for now but i cant make a real decision until the remake is released
I would definitely like to see some of the original actors make a return