by Lion » Sat Jul 17, 2010 3:33 pm
by Cyrus » Sat Jul 17, 2010 9:23 pm
by Lion » Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:38 pm
Cyrus wrote:You're right Lion, this is one of the most boring movies I've ever seen. 2,5 hours wasted on nothing.
by Cyrus » Sun Jul 18, 2010 10:43 pm
by wargod » Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:12 am
Cyrus wrote:Lion wrote:i can't believe this movie was even nominated for an oscar. the guy that played landa was the most interesting character in the whole movie, besides that it stunk.
I wish you wrote that before, I got it today from Blockbuster.
by union_jack » Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:50 am
by Lion » Mon Jul 19, 2010 1:07 pm
union_jack wrote:a lot of people reckon that after jackie brown didnt experience the massive success of his previous films, tarantino was discouraged from making more mature films and started making all these "homages" that are at best inconsistent.
by 4nik8 » Mon Jul 19, 2010 2:05 pm
Lion wrote:Lion wrote:union_jack wrote:a lot of people reckon that after jackie brown didnt experience the massive success of his previous films, tarantino was discouraged from making more mature films and started making all these "homages" that are at best inconsistent.
the truth is, is that jackie brown was a good movie. tarantino got too greedy. i am sure he signed a contract to pop a number amount of movies in a certain amount of time in order to get financed for "personal projects". but this just rushed him to come up with crap. the magic tarantino had was he hired in his first, say three movies, were a bunch of unknown actors or washed up actors. this allowed for the cast not to take the value away from the film therefor the audience was more concentrated on the film and it's message than the "big name actor(s)".
by Lion » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:15 pm
by turnbull gbr » Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:50 pm
Lion wrote:i honestly believe that if robert deniro wasn't in jackie brown, the movie would of been better. deniro doesn't connect with samuel l. jackson's character. i think he goes on the set thinking: "oh yeah, look at me i am robert deniro, the best actor in the world". i would say "you were". since the mid 90's, deniro has been overrated.
by union_jack » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:20 pm
Lion wrote:i honestly believe that if robert deniro wasn't in jackie brown, the movie would of been better. deniro doesn't connect with samuel l. jackson's character. i think he goes on the set thinking: "oh yeah, look at me i am robert deniro, the best actor in the world". i would say "you were". since the mid 90's, deniro has been overrated.
by Suburban Warlord » Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:55 pm
by 4nik8 » Tue Jul 20, 2010 3:44 pm
Lion wrote:tarantino's days are over
overrated untalented "actor" named leonardo decrapio
since the mid 90's, deniro has been overrated.
adrien brody and topher grace as the tough dudes??
by turnbull gbr » Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:37 pm
Suburban Warlord wrote:That's exactly it. His character is just out of prison. It's culture shock, and he's
a bit socially retarded. The scene where that older lady is putting on a strip tease
for him or dancing around for him, and he is just rocking back and forth in his
chair with that silly grin on his face always cracks me up. Priceless!
by union_jack » Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:55 pm