Page 1 of 1
What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 12:43 am
by Lion
The Karet Kid shouldn't of and True Lies should.
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:37 am
by Rem
Pirates of the Carribean did not need a sequel. Curse of the Black Pearl (meh) had an extremely small number of loose ends. So what do we get? A bloated sequel that basically rides on those ridiculously small loose ends for two and a half hours. Yeesh.
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 10:06 am
by taylor
well im kinda reversing it but the first fast and furius shouldn't of happend the other to were brillant
i hate vin disle. does anyone acctualy like him?

Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:26 pm
by MiddleMan07
Rem wrote:
Pirates of the Carribean did not need a sequel. Curse of the Black Pearl (meh) had an extremely small number of loose ends. So what do we get? A bloated sequel that basically rides on those ridiculously small loose ends for two and a half hours. Yeesh.
you have to admit though, the second pirates movie was pretty awesome. You really have to hand it to the effects depot
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 8:50 pm
by Storm86
LIONS ON THE RED CARPET wrote:
The Karet Kid shouldn't of and True Lies should.
no the Karate kid movies were cool until the crappy next karate kid.
and get ready for the next installment of POTC I think it's a trilogy
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:14 pm
by back2coney
Batman and Robin should never have happend.
Resident evil 2 wasn't very good, waiting on the next one to confirm it's shockingness, but i here on good sources thats it's actually pretty good.
Exclusive picture for you, thanx babe.
Did you know about Dusk till Dawn two???? ?yeah it was bad.
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 1:10 am
by Daddy Cool
Scarface cant have a sequel but it could be a prequel to that and if yall heard of The Mack,it should be a sequel to thatĀ

Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 2:27 am
by Lion
OMG I just saw that there is a Road House 2 and a musical about the film!!!!haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Mon Jul 17, 2006 10:35 am
by Rem
MiddleMan07 wrote:
Rem wrote:
Pirates of the Carribean did not need a sequel. Curse of the Black Pearl (meh) had an extremely small number of loose ends. So what do we get? A bloated sequel that basically rides on those ridiculously small loose ends for two and a half hours. Yeesh.
you have to admit though, the second pirates movie was pretty awesome. You really have to hand it to the effects depot
No I don't, and sure, though the effects were good I really would have preferred some retro Slither-esque prostecthics on Bill Nighy.
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:11 am
by Kujo_87
Daddy Cool wrote:
Scarface cant have a sequel but it could be a prequel to that and if yall heard of The Mack,it should be a sequel to that
Actually there's supposed to be a Scarface game comin' out on PS3 and XboX 360 where Tony survives the attack and has to rebuild his empire,as for a "Mack" sequel, I don't know...I guess Snoop Dogg could play Goldie and Dave Chapelle could do Richard Pryor's part

[-o< RIP Richard Pryor
I don't think they should've made a Transporter 2. The original actually had a pretty good plot for an action movie and the fact that Jason Statham did all his stunts with nothing but his own athletiscism was cool. But then they had to get sucky actors for the second one and the CG car stunts were kind of annoying. The thing that really killed it for me though was that Lola chick. I hate when they make the female characters all slutty.
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 8:23 am
by SNOW 1
Napoleon Dynamite should haveĀ a sequel the ending sucked in that movie it finished in the middle of no where
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Posted: Thu Jul 20, 2006 9:58 pm
by Storm86
Napoleon Dynamite shouldn't have a sequel it shouldn't have had a first. I got to thinking about childhood movies and I think the land before time sequels have gotten way out of hand