Page 1 of 1

Does anyone agree/what are your thoughts

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 9:00 pm
by Geoffrey
Whenever I watch the Warrior movie, I always seem to think how LUCKY all the gangs are tat get beaten up by the Warriors.

Think of the baseball furies for example.
The Warriors beat them up, and left it at that. They were all cleary alive, aswell as CONCIOUS.
But what if the Furies won? They'd probably not stop hitting the warriors with their bats untill they were dead.

Same situation with the Punks.
If your gang carries knifes and purposley tries to fight other gangs, you're intending to kill; where as the Warriors do what they have t do, and then leave it.

Does anyone understand what I'm tryna say?

Re: Does anyone agree/what are your thoughts

Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 10:22 pm
by stevo2k6
i know what you mean, but remember the riffs wanted them alive, but apart from that, yeah maybe they would have beaten them to literally death where as the warriors have more honour and could just beat them up and leave and forget

Re: Does anyone agree/what are your thoughts

Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 1:24 pm
by The Swan
Hey Geoffrey... good topic!!!

Yeah, Masai wanted them alive... if not, wasted!!!
Anyway, I don't think that was the point... I mean , that night, every gang had to fight only 1 "match" vs The Warriors... so, stop or kill them was their only aim!!!
Instead The Warriors had to fight several "matches"... and when they beat a gang, they had only to go on 4 coming back Coney!!!
No waste of time!!! 8)