the wanders or warriors
- moonrunner27
- Rank: Riff
- Posts: 223
- Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2010 4:25 pm
- Location: CONEY ISLAND!
the wanders or warriors
same time similar gangs same city who would win the fight i think the warriors but itl be a good fight
maybe we'll get to waste a few heads along the way...
Re: the wanders or warriors
uhhhh no they was just made in the same year idiot, the wanderers is based on 50s gangs.......once again how are you gonna come on our forum just to be ranked warrior.......some people are so stupid
- skullboy13
- Rank: Bopper
- Posts: 54
- Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2011 3:11 pm
Re: the wanders or warriors
tbf they wer both made from works of literature of course the era difference is concrete it would be like asking who would win romans or Hitler lol still tho id say the Warriors if they took down Perry quick enough, i think thats his name anyway the "leave the kid alone" guy
Re: the wanders or warriors
Allowing for the decade difference, and if it was 9-on-9 guys; The Warriors would rip them apart. It wouldn't even be a competition. In a mass gang war; say 30 on 30; the Warriors would still win, easily.
- Gramercy Riffs Yeh Right
- Rank: Electric Eliminator
- Posts: 93
- Joined: Tue Feb 16, 2010 11:36 pm
- Location: uk
Re: the wanders or warriors
none of the Wanderers with the exception of Perry were even tough so the Warriors would win easily,a better opponent would be the Greasers from Outsiders but even they would get wrecked...but if Johnny from Outsiders was really Karate Kid then it could even things up.....
- nightarmyWARRIOR
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Croatia
Re: the wanders or warriors
Well, all Wanderers are too young, they all go to high school (18, 19 years old). The Warriors are little older.
Ages are not matter anyway, I think in my opinion that the Warriors would win cuz they beat Furies when they weren't armed, Furies had baseball bats, and they still beat them. They've beat Punks in little space (toilet) when, I think, only Cowboy had baseball bat and Rembrandt spray (but he didn't fight). So 5 of them vs Punks and they had knifes, chains etc. and there were more of them then Warriors.
My point is that Warriors have brain, they are smart, 5 of them could beat 8-9 guys (example).
So, The Warriors wins definitely!
Ages are not matter anyway, I think in my opinion that the Warriors would win cuz they beat Furies when they weren't armed, Furies had baseball bats, and they still beat them. They've beat Punks in little space (toilet) when, I think, only Cowboy had baseball bat and Rembrandt spray (but he didn't fight). So 5 of them vs Punks and they had knifes, chains etc. and there were more of them then Warriors.
My point is that Warriors have brain, they are smart, 5 of them could beat 8-9 guys (example).
So, The Warriors wins definitely!

Re: the wanders or warriors
The Warriors would own them, their more ferocious in street fighting.
Ajax vs Perry would be a good fight, although Ajax would win, he's just more aggressive!
Ducky Boys were pretty insane!
For short dudes haha.
But yeah, my vote "...goes out to that real live bunch from Coney, and I do mean The Warriors"
Ajax vs Perry would be a good fight, although Ajax would win, he's just more aggressive!
Ducky Boys were pretty insane!
For short dudes haha.
But yeah, my vote "...goes out to that real live bunch from Coney, and I do mean The Warriors"
Ye who believe
When ye meet the Unbelievers in hostile array
Never turn your backs to them.
- Al-Anfal
When ye meet the Unbelievers in hostile array
Never turn your backs to them.
- Al-Anfal
Re: the wanders or warriors
For an even match in my opinion I would place the Warriors against the Fordham Baldies from The Wanderers.
- chrismasonic
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 1:29 pm
- Location: Newcastle.England
- Contact:
Re: the wanders or warriors
I'd Like To See Emilio (Joey's Dad) Versus All The Baseball Furies...
- nightarmyWARRIOR
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 477
- Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 3:53 pm
- Location: Croatia
Re: the wanders or warriors
Haha... nice one. You're right, he's a badass anyway.chrismasonic wrote:I'd Like To See Emilio (Joey's Dad) Versus All The Baseball Furies...
-
- Rank: Destroyer
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:19 pm
Re: the wanders or warriors
The Wanderers were good, but not real good. They were teenagers and would get thier asses kicked by the Lizzies!
Great movie though, the guy that they call Meat wouldve gave Ajax a run for his money. Big strong dude with an attitude. But that's it I'm afraid for the Wanderers.
The Wongs were cool at least they faught, I always wanted to see the Huns throw down with the Warriors in China Town, but that never happened.
And the Ducky Boys, now here is a crazy bunch. I wouldn't want to get cuaght wndering around in thier neighborhood after dark. They were creepy man! They all just show up to fight everyone!
However the Riffs or the Furies would crack thier skulls for sure.
Chilly Dog

Great movie though, the guy that they call Meat wouldve gave Ajax a run for his money. Big strong dude with an attitude. But that's it I'm afraid for the Wanderers.
The Wongs were cool at least they faught, I always wanted to see the Huns throw down with the Warriors in China Town, but that never happened.
And the Ducky Boys, now here is a crazy bunch. I wouldn't want to get cuaght wndering around in thier neighborhood after dark. They were creepy man! They all just show up to fight everyone!
However the Riffs or the Furies would crack thier skulls for sure.
Chilly Dog
Re: the wanders or warriors
You're on a Warriors forum asking about who would win between the Warriors and Wanderers?!. C'mon, The Orphans would kill those clownsmoonrunner27 wrote:same time similar gangs same city who would win the fight i think the warriors but itl be a good fight

you gonna pay for that?