Page 1 of 3

what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 12:54 pm
by Swans right hand man
in the movie we see the orphans  run to start a rumble with the warriors not noing they are wanted.they get really work up and are ready to fight. what do u think would of happed if they had done the warriors over i mean would they have got a heavy rep?????????? ;)

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:15 pm
by The Swan
You know, your question could also be interesting... but do you really think orphans were able to..........
.......... I think they rebelled because of Mercy, you know if she hadn't talked, they had been happier!!! 8)

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 3:32 pm
by Swans right hand man
yeah they were angry because of her which gives them more of a chance they must of been seeing red! :evil:

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:35 pm
by Lion
They probably thought they had a chance, only because the Orphans were many in comparison to the Warriors.  Nonetheless, I say the Warriors would taken them if it came down to that.  As you can see, their self steem dropped pretty quick when they got a taste of that molotov.

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:34 pm
by The Jewish Juggernaut
I dont think it matters what they did. Unless they were all heavely peacked they might have a chance. You cant change the fact that they are pansies.

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 1:05 pm
by stevo2k6
The Swan wrote: You know, your question could also be intersting... but do you really think orphans were able to..........
.......... I think they rebelled because of Mercy, you know if she hadn't talked, they had been happier!!! 8)
you know its amazing what influece from a woman can do, they make you all raged and ready to fight, its like when ur out clubbing and someones wants to fight and you say "no point in fighting wont solve anything"

then a woman says "your nothing your afraid" etc that will make you raged and fight

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:20 pm
by danny06
if the orpans did start to rumble with the warriors they should of at least bopped decently and not all attacked at once because even a lot of weak boppers can still pack a punch if there are quite a bit just like vermin said "thirties a lot more than eight" lol

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Fri Nov 16, 2007 10:45 pm
by The Swan
stevo2k6 wrote:
The Swan wrote: You know, your question could also be intersting... but do you really think orphans were able to..........
.......... I think they rebelled because of Mercy, you know if she hadn't talked, they had been happier!!! 8)
you know its amazing what influece from a woman can do, they make you all raged and ready to fight, its like when ur out clubbing and someones wants to fight and you say "no point in fighting wont solve anything"

then a woman says "your nothing your afraid" etc that will make you raged and fight
Ye man, we've the same point of view about, and I suppose many of us think the same... so the women and their power... only another question... another doubt... Well, always in relation to that scene: if orphans' leader was like Swan (or anyway another hardcore guy), would have he done what Mercy wanted?
I don't think so, i.e. women power (and women "treasure!!!") can be very persuasive and dangerous... TRUE... but if a woman meets a man... a MAN like Swan, that man will always do what he wants to!!! Or 50% what he wants to... but he won't ever be a puppet like orphans' leader!!! Well that's simply my opinion, what about you guys!?! 8)

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 4:02 am
by Lion
I still don't understand why they ran up stairs when they could of jumped the Warriors rith there and then.  Eventually the other Orphans on the rooftop would of seen them fighting and run down to help them out.

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Sat Nov 17, 2007 11:45 pm
by The Swan
Lions wrote: I still don't understand why they ran up stairs when they could of jumped the Warriors rith there and then.  Eventually the other Orphans on the rooftop would of seen them fighting and run down to help them out.
You know what, mate?
Yours, is a good point!!! I'd add, were they sure that only 10-20 orphans could be enough 4 The Warriors??? :lol: :lol: :lol:
I'd have another consideration... I know it's the movie, but if you watch that scene, when Swan throws the molotov at the car, some of the orphans fall to the ground... ok.
But, the others? I mean, in my opinion, most of them weren't hurt (or died???) and that was surely not a sorta SUPER BOMB, so why didn't they keep running after The Warriors???
I've always wondered that!!! 8)

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 12:26 pm
by Warriorfan54321
I think Ajax was right when he said they were wimps.  Yea yea I'm going by what they look like and did in the movie, but they didn't chase the warriors. They just went on walking in the tsreets like nothing happened. So they were definately being wimps at that point.

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Sun Nov 18, 2007 4:45 pm
by danny06
Or maybe just maybe it might have been because the orphans thought that the warriors had more weapons in snows small bag such as knives or molotovs. *just a thought*

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 12:58 pm
by stevo2k6
danny06 wrote: Or maybe just maybe it might have been because the orphans thought that the warriors had more weapons in snows small bag such as knives or molotovs. *just a thought*
possible or they just didnt want the unfair advantage at the start of the rumble is they was gna be one

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 2:09 pm
by danny06
stevo2k6 wrote:
danny06 wrote: Or maybe just maybe it might have been because the orphans thought that the warriors had more weapons in snows small bag such as knives or molotovs. *just a thought*
possible or they just didnt want the unfair advantage at the start of the rumble is they was gna be one
it could be that too but its probably just because the orphans are wimps and cowards.

Re: what if the orphans had ....

Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2007 3:03 pm
by stevo2k6
danny06 wrote:
stevo2k6 wrote:
danny06 wrote: Or maybe just maybe it might have been because the orphans thought that the warriors had more weapons in snows small bag such as knives or molotovs. *just a thought*
possible or they just didnt want the unfair advantage at the start of the rumble is they was gna be one
it could be that too but its probably just because the orphans are wimps and cowards.
they must have been wimps because they wasnt even invited to the conclave so therefore never earned such an honour