What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
The Karet Kid shouldn't of and True Lies should.
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Pirates of the Carribean did not need a sequel. Curse of the Black Pearl (meh) had an extremely small number of loose ends. So what do we get? A bloated sequel that basically rides on those ridiculously small loose ends for two and a half hours. Yeesh.
[img]http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&id=1808565595&cf=pg&photoid=522161&intl=us[/img]
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
well im kinda reversing it but the first fast and furius shouldn't of happend the other to were brillant
i hate vin disle. does anyone acctualy like him?

i hate vin disle. does anyone acctualy like him?
"the truce... is it still on"
-
MiddleMan07
- Warrior
- Posts: 1013
- Joined: Fri Feb 03, 2006 8:14 pm
- Location: Regina, Canada
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
you have to admit though, the second pirates movie was pretty awesome. You really have to hand it to the effects depotRem wrote: Pirates of the Carribean did not need a sequel. Curse of the Black Pearl (meh) had an extremely small number of loose ends. So what do we get? A bloated sequel that basically rides on those ridiculously small loose ends for two and a half hours. Yeesh.
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
no the Karate kid movies were cool until the crappy next karate kid.LIONS ON THE RED CARPET wrote: The Karet Kid shouldn't of and True Lies should.
and get ready for the next installment of POTC I think it's a trilogy
[img]http://www.duallegacy.com/toon/linkfile/warriors/storm.jpg[/img]
- back2coney
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 680
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2005 7:33 pm
- Location: London
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Batman and Robin should never have happend.
Resident evil 2 wasn't very good, waiting on the next one to confirm it's shockingness, but i here on good sources thats it's actually pretty good.
Exclusive picture for you, thanx babe.

Did you know about Dusk till Dawn two???? ?yeah it was bad.
Resident evil 2 wasn't very good, waiting on the next one to confirm it's shockingness, but i here on good sources thats it's actually pretty good.
Exclusive picture for you, thanx babe.

Did you know about Dusk till Dawn two???? ?yeah it was bad.
Last edited by back2coney on Sun Jul 16, 2006 9:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
" Real tough mothers ain't ya! "
[img]http://looksy.co.uk/files/images/rare22_1_0.jpg[/img]
[img]http://looksy.co.uk/files/images/rare22_1_0.jpg[/img]
- Daddy Cool
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 309
- Joined: Fri Mar 31, 2006 1:09 am
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Scarface cant have a sequel but it could be a prequel to that and if yall heard of The Mack,it should be a sequel to that 
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
OMG I just saw that there is a Road House 2 and a musical about the film!!!!haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
No I don't, and sure, though the effects were good I really would have preferred some retro Slither-esque prostecthics on Bill Nighy.MiddleMan07 wrote:you have to admit though, the second pirates movie was pretty awesome. You really have to hand it to the effects depotRem wrote: Pirates of the Carribean did not need a sequel. Curse of the Black Pearl (meh) had an extremely small number of loose ends. So what do we get? A bloated sequel that basically rides on those ridiculously small loose ends for two and a half hours. Yeesh.
[img]http://movies.yahoo.com/shop?d=hv&id=1808565595&cf=pg&photoid=522161&intl=us[/img]
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Actually there's supposed to be a Scarface game comin' out on PS3 and XboX 360 where Tony survives the attack and has to rebuild his empire,as for a "Mack" sequel, I don't know...I guess Snoop Dogg could play Goldie and Dave Chapelle could do Richard Pryor's partDaddy Cool wrote: Scarface cant have a sequel but it could be a prequel to that and if yall heard of The Mack,it should be a sequel to that![]()
[-o< RIP Richard Pryor
I don't think they should've made a Transporter 2. The original actually had a pretty good plot for an action movie and the fact that Jason Statham did all his stunts with nothing but his own athletiscism was cool. But then they had to get sucky actors for the second one and the CG car stunts were kind of annoying. The thing that really killed it for me though was that Lola chick. I hate when they make the female characters all slutty.
[img]http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/8223/sig22ih.png[/img]
GO GET IT
GO GET IT
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Napoleon Dynamite should have a sequel the ending sucked in that movie it finished in the middle of no where
[url=http://imageshack.us][img]http://img170.imageshack.us/img170/461/mbsuserbarrm0.gif[/img][/url]
Re: What movies should of & shouldn't have sequels?
Napoleon Dynamite shouldn't have a sequel it shouldn't have had a first. I got to thinking about childhood movies and I think the land before time sequels have gotten way out of hand
[img]http://www.duallegacy.com/toon/linkfile/warriors/storm.jpg[/img]
