Furies.....Overrated?
-
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 617
- Joined: Sat Jul 22, 2006 4:50 am
Re: Furies.....Overrated?
Well the Punks fight was longer probably because there was more people. And The Furies don't impress me much. I think they're lame. They were outnumbered with bats, as most people have stated, but if you watch their fighting style it sucks.
[img]http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2411/2237788641_1dd5356a28_o.gif[/img]
Re: Furies.....Overrated?
trixter468 wrote: Well the Punks fight was longer probably because there was more people. And The Furies don't impress me much. I think they're lame. They were outnumbered with bats, as most people have stated, but if you watch their fighting style it sucks.

Re: Furies.....Overrated?
I think stickwarrior nailed it this movie was called the warriors not the baseball furies it was about the warriors amazing story of how the bopped their way all the way back to coney.
[img]http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc260/swan197/swan1979.jpg[/img]
- ajax the warrior
- Rank: Warrior
- Posts: 692
- Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 10:33 pm
- Location: queensland australia
Re: Furies.....Overrated?
The furies are not overated they are one of the best gangs on the movie and on the game no way are they overated
Im a little teapot short and stout
Re: Furies.....Overrated?
this is the movie forum the game doesnt count. but yes they are over rated they had bats and outnumbered the warriors 9-4 well 9-3 coz cowboy was knocked down, and snow only held them so really swan and ajax did the real fighting, so yes they are over rated they wimpsajax the warrior wrote: The furies are not overated they are one of the best gangs on the movie and on the game no way are they overated
