Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Leave your comments and messages about the 1979 cult movie.
User avatar
Lion
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3172
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:20 pm
Location: Texas

Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by Lion »

What do you guys think.  Was he the second in command or like the Riffs, did the 2nd in command stayed behind?  Was he just for that night?
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]

User avatar
The Swan
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1919
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by The Swan »

Well when ajax wants to be WarLord, in the graveyard, everybody tells him that Cleon has named Swan WarChief. Almost surely during the "colloquy", in the first scenes, between Cleon and the guys. So I think he was 2nd only 4 that night, too. Then, if Swan was anyway, always 1st Cleon's choice... to me it's true.
But I don't think there was another official 2nd waiting 4 them, or attending if they were in trouble, as insurance policy. 
I mean The Riffs needed a more complete organization than The Warriors, by force. 8)
[color=#FF0000][align=center]Wanna Fight? Make Your Move![/align][/color]
[align=center][img]http://digilander.libero.it/ran.s/HoustonTheSwanLogo.jpg[/img][/align]
[color=#FF0000][align=center]"That's cause u guys r so bad they're afraid of u!!!"[/align][/color]

User avatar
Lion
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3172
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:20 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by Lion »

I think he was 2nd in command for that night also.  I feel there was someone higher than Swan back in Coney.  I guess that's why it was easy for Ajax to challenge Swan, knowing he wasn't really in charge of the whole gang but just the 7.
Last edited by Anonymous on Thu Dec 06, 2007 11:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]

User avatar
Hector
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 327
Joined: Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:30 am

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by Hector »

I think he was in 2nd command for just that night also I mean, you can tell in the deleted scene at the start. Cleon says, "Out of more than 150 members, you have been chosen for this expedition..."
Well, he said something like that. To me, it seemed as all they knew about each other, was their names. Thus meaning (well I think) they were chosen for that one night.

Then again at particular times in the movie they seemed to know a bit more than usual.
[img]http://i211.photobucket.com/albums/bb43/Nickpenno212/SinCity3.jpg[/img]

stevo2k6
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: burnley england
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by stevo2k6 »

maybe so, the real 2nd cammand may have guarded the gangout incase of of anything
S.Ritson

adam88
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1474
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 5:04 pm

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by adam88 »

Well, this is an interesting question, because its hard to say if Cleon just chose them all as his "special 8" for that paticular night, or were they always his right hand men.  I assume with a special night like that, Swan was always the 2nd in command.  After all if your going to a conclave like that, it would be logical to only bring the best of the best, and not permenent substitutions.  So I truly think Swan was his right hand man.  Now the question is, would Swan stick with that call of duty and raise the gang his self, or does he have an alternate fate, to break away from that position?

stevo2k6
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: burnley england
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by stevo2k6 »

i dont know, i mean he wouldnt leave the other gang members. maybe he would settle with mercy
S.Ritson

User avatar
true-warrior
Rank: Bopper
Posts: 50
Joined: Mon Nov 19, 2007 6:58 pm
Location: newcastle,England

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by true-warrior »

swan was 2nd in command in the nine delegats and those nine were the best so i think hed be 2nd in command for the 120+ affiliates

stevo2k6
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: burnley england
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by stevo2k6 »

true-warrior wrote: swan was 2nd in command in the nine delegats and those nine were the best so i think hed be 2nd in command for the 120+ affiliates
yes i think thats true, they did send the best 9
S.Ritson

User avatar
Swans right hand man
Rank: Orphan
Posts: 38
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 8:10 pm

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by Swans right hand man »

i believe that its hes role within the 9. hes cleons right hand man to help advise while out of coney.Maybe theres someone higher up then cleon?
TO DIE IN BATTLE IS TO LIVE FOREVER!

stevo2k6
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: burnley england
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by stevo2k6 »

Swans right hand man wrote: i believe that its hes role within the 9. hes cleons right hand man to help advise while out of coney.Maybe theres someone higher up then cleon?
nah dont think anyones higher than cleon or instead of cleon talkin to the warriors in the deleted scene it wud have been someone else telling cleon he was the leader out there
S.Ritson

User avatar
Lion
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3172
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 4:20 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by Lion »

stevo2k6 wrote:
Swans right hand man wrote: i believe that its hes role within the 9. hes cleons right hand man to help advise while out of coney.Maybe theres someone higher up then cleon?
nah dont think anyones higher than cleon or instead of cleon talkin to the warriors in the deleted scene it wud have been someone else telling cleon he was the leader out there
Someone higer than Swan? yes....than Cleon? no.
[img]http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b232/METALTANK/squares.jpg[/img]

User avatar
The Swan
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1919
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by The Swan »

stevo2k6 wrote:
Swans right hand man wrote: i believe that its hes role within the 9. hes cleons right hand man to help advise while out of coney.Maybe theres someone higher up then cleon?
nah dont think anyones higher than cleon or instead of cleon talkin to the warriors in the deleted scene it wud have been someone else telling cleon he was the leader out there
Yeah, I think the same, I mean we cannot be sure about other Warriors "doubts"... but no chance about someone higher than Cleon... we'd have seen him if... so I say: Cleon 100% War Lord, and absolutely Warriors #1! 8)
[color=#FF0000][align=center]Wanna Fight? Make Your Move![/align][/color]
[align=center][img]http://digilander.libero.it/ran.s/HoustonTheSwanLogo.jpg[/img][/align]
[color=#FF0000][align=center]"That's cause u guys r so bad they're afraid of u!!!"[/align][/color]

stevo2k6
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1409
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 11:45 pm
Location: burnley england
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by stevo2k6 »

The Swan wrote:
stevo2k6 wrote:
Swans right hand man wrote: i believe that its hes role within the 9. hes cleons right hand man to help advise while out of coney.Maybe theres someone higher up then cleon?
nah dont think anyones higher than cleon or instead of cleon talkin to the warriors in the deleted scene it wud have been someone else telling cleon he was the leader out there
Yeah, I think the same, I mean we cannot be sure about other Warriors "doubts"... but no chance about someone higher than Cleon... we'd have seen him if... so I say: Cleon 100% War Lord, and absolutely Warriors #1! 8)
yes i think that to mate, cleons was defo the leader
S.Ritson

User avatar
The Swan
Rank: Warrior
Posts: 1919
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 10:14 pm
Location: Italy
Contact:

Re: Was Swan always 2nd in command?

Post by The Swan »

stevo2k6 wrote:
The Swan wrote:
stevo2k6 wrote: nah dont think anyones higher than cleon or instead of cleon talkin to the warriors in the deleted scene it wud have been someone else telling cleon he was the leader out there
Yeah, I think the same, I mean we cannot be sure about other Warriors "doubts"... but no chance about someone higher than Cleon... we'd have seen him if... so I say: Cleon 100% War Lord, and absolutely Warriors #1! 8)
yes i think that to mate, cleons was defo the leader
... and indeed we could square or close the circle (is it the right way of saying, I think, tell me if not!!!) now!!!
I mean because of luther it was a bad night..ok!!!
But because of Cleon, GREAT LEADER... I just think, The Warriors were there... and if everything had gone good, The Warriors would have got better their rank... there was something (about gang respect) between Cleon and Cyrus!!! Another reason because of I think that Cleon really was The Leader and a Very Good Leader!!! NO DOUBT!!! Well IMO!!! 8)
Last edited by Anonymous on Tue Dec 18, 2007 9:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
[color=#FF0000][align=center]Wanna Fight? Make Your Move![/align][/color]
[align=center][img]http://digilander.libero.it/ran.s/HoustonTheSwanLogo.jpg[/img][/align]
[color=#FF0000][align=center]"That's cause u guys r so bad they're afraid of u!!!"[/align][/color]

Post Reply