do you like the idea of a new warriors movie

[warriors4life2008]

hello everybody im really mad because tony scot decide to make a new warriors movie with crips and bloods in it oh and the worst thing its in los angeles :evilhe should atleast have the nerve to put it in new york
and people who never even heard about the real warriors will be sayin they are warriors just because they seen this new movie and i wont beabl to stand that i have so much original warriors stuff and i wont beable to buy the new stuff it wont seem right to do
if you feel the same way i do reply to this or send me a message i need a way to understand this

[stevo2k6]

when you get to your 10 posts, use search theres about 60 topics on this,

[HIGH HAT]

ID MAKE IT A PREQUEL..
takes place in the 50s..the start of the Warriors
the hell with this 2000's version..it would just be guns hip hop Bulls**#,rapp..Tony Scott??..please
bring in an old school director..no CGI!!

id make it a real gang movie fights with fists,chains,etc..when men were men..gangs were gangs
todays gangs are a bunch of wimps..hiding behind a gun

[Chayton]

I don't like the idea! the old one is priceless!! What they should do is edit up the deleted scenes, slap them into a brand new version of the Warriors in HI-Def and be done with it!
Don't make a new one

[GramercyRiff99]

Okay, I deleted that last option, because that's quite uncalled for. Calling someone gay as a comedy option is not only immature as all hell, but offensive as well.

Besides that, only Warrior ranks are supposed to be making polls on the site. I'm not banning you since that rule hasn't been added to the rules page for some reason, but just for future reference.

[flashman]

There is just no way you could do a new movie unless Larry Gordon and Walter Hill were in charge along with some of the other people. I just don't think this would be possible.

[stevo2k6]

i still think ppl should read my other post on this thread

[flashman]

Without Walter Hill and Larry Gordon it would be a disaster. I think they might have gotten a little lucky too with the choice of actors. i mean this group really clicked and fit their roles.

[flashman]

I don't understand...should we make comments about this subject on another post? If so witch one. If there are 60 then which one should we use...just curious.

[stevo2k6]

for you flashman u have over 10 posts so here

http://warriorsmovie.co.uk/forum/index. ... ;topicseen

you will find what your looking for here and more

[flashman]

It doesn't look like too many people like the idea of a new movie....I just don't see how it would work....it would be sooo different.

[stevo2k6]

It doesn't look like too many people like the idea of a new movie....I just don't see how it would work....it would be sooo different.

of course it would be different, its a remake.

[bigbadjobby]

I love the remake of Dawn of the Dead, and still love the original.

Same with Willy Wonka.

The Warriors would never be the same as the original film, but I'd still watch it. Shame it's about cars n guns n all that stuff, there's more than enough of that.

If it's rubbish just ignore it. In my mind the recent Star Wars movies never existed.

[flashman]

I mean the whole atmosphere of the entire movie would be different and how could anyone do as good of job casting the characters. The story line couldn't possibly be as good and I realize that they would probably use most of the original. I think if someone does this that they are capitalizing on what we have with the original just to make a buck and I hope for whatever reason that it just doesn't happen. This would without a doubt be an example of a remake not even coming close to living up to the original.

[stevo2k6]

i must say its better with bare fist fighting, guns and stuff would just be your typical action movie. we want more than that!