Looking forward to the new film?

derbywarrior · Post by **derbywarrior** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:17 pm

Looking forward to the new film? i am sooo looking forward to the film, doubt it will be as good as the first one but hope it will be half decent at least!

cowboy rules · Post by **cowboy rules** » Tue Jan 10, 2006 6:20 pm

i've got mixed feelings. im kinda curious but at the same time it may make the original movie look bad! which i thought was never possible!

FcFAjax · Post by **FcFAjax** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 7:32 am

I want to see how they do it, i know its not supposed to be really anything like the 1979 Warriors. But still i hope they dont ruin the Heavy Rep of the Warriors by putting like Nick Cannon as Conchise or something lame.

Post by **SoldierHeavyMuscle** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 8:49 am

cowboy rules wrote:im kinda curious but at the same time it may make the original movie look bad!

WHAT DID YOU JUST SAY?????!!

HEY T, FOX, GONZ, WC, SOMEONE!!
TACKHAMMER, PLEASE!!!

Storm86 · Post by **Storm86** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 10:34 am

*hands SHM a sledgehammer* there ya go big man swing away

Post by **SoldierHeavyMuscle** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:01 pm

Storm86 wrote:*hands SHM a sledgehammer* there ya go big man swing away

thank you, storm!!!
come on, vets!!!
you guys gettin old!! :p
my young man storm here, beat ya's to the punch!!!

Post by **GonzoNYC** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:11 pm

Hey...I'm at work and have to sneak on here a couple times a day!!

This so-called remake will be a travesty and I for one will not pay to go see it. As has been discussed in too many threads already the moviemakers are exploiting our film for money. There is no need to call this a remake as characters, story points, and most disturbing of all location is different. Had Scott said he was using the idea from The Warriors to make a new film about gang life but not say it was a remake...more power to him. But to mislead people and call it a remake is preposterous.

Post by **SoldierHeavyMuscle** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 4:22 pm

GonzoNYC wrote:Hey...I'm at work and have to sneak on here a couple times a day!!

This so-called remake will be a travesty and I for one will not pay to go see it. As has been discussed in too many threads already the moviemakers are exploiting our film for money. There is no need to call this a remake as characters, story points, and most disturbing of all location is different. Had Scott said he was using the idea from The Warriors to make a new film about gang life but not say it was a remake...more power to him. But to mislead people and call it a remake is preposterous.

HEAR, HEAR!!!!!

WELL SAID, GONZ!!!

knowledge · Post by **knowledge** » Wed Jan 11, 2006 11:53 pm

GonzoNYC wrote:Hey...I'm at work and have to sneak on here a couple times a day!!

This so-called remake will be a travesty and I for one will not pay to go see it. As has been discussed in too many threads already the moviemakers are exploiting our film for money. There is no need to call this a remake as characters, story points, and most disturbing of all location is different. Had Scott said he was using the idea from The Warriors to make a new film about gang life but not say it was a remake...more power to him. But to mislead people and call it a remake is preposterous.

WORD! Cheers!

FcFAjax · Post by **FcFAjax** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 7:15 am

soldierheavymuscle wrote:
GonzoNYC wrote:Hey...I'm at work and have to sneak on here a couple times a day!!

This so-called remake will be a travesty and I for one will not pay to go see it. As has been discussed in too many threads already the moviemakers are exploiting our film for money. There is no need to call this a remake as characters, story points, and most disturbing of all location is different. Had Scott said he was using the idea from The Warriors to make a new film about gang life but not say it was a remake...more power to him. But to mislead people and call it a remake is preposterous.
HEAR, HEAR!!!!!
WELL SAID, GONZ!!!

he said it best, the new movie isnt supposed to any any similarities besides the name the warriors itself and a very loosly the plot. i want to see it just so i can bop a few heads outside the theater for anybody who dares say the original isnt better! im a new blood to this amazing movie, and its already becoming a way of life for me!

Manson-Cryptorchild · Post by **Manson-Cryptorchild** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 2:33 pm

Well...hello....I feel the same way as cowboy rules, I am looking forward to it, but I don't want it to ruin what people know the original as.

Storm86 · Post by **Storm86** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:25 am

and it will. geez kids these days have no respect for classics.

Ajaxxx · Post by **Ajaxxx** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 2:43 am

Just sounds like a way to draw in fans by taking the name. I havn't heard anything im digging about the film.

Mercy · Post by **Mercy** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:18 am

No, I'm not looking forward to see this movie.
I thing I know what Cowboy rules means... Of course this new movie is not gonna give the Warriors a bad name... not for us. What makes me fell really sad, is that the younger generations are gonna refer to The Warriors as " The Original Warriors" or worse " The Old Warriors movie" instead of simply THE WARRIORS...

SHM and Storm, stop with the atack on the guy!

Storm86 · Post by **Storm86** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 5:41 am

aww Mercy we was just having a little fun