certified 18

iconic arts · Post by **iconic arts** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 1:45 pm

when I first saw the warriors film I was 17 & it was classed as an X certificate , no under 18's..... What do you think the films age certificate would be today PG I would say. I let my 8 & 10 year old watch the film & they loved it....

paperdollorphan · Post by **paperdollorphan** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 3:24 pm

yeah i'd say PG also. with all the newer much more violent movies out now, and all the violent video games it seems 6 yr olds are playing, it'd be a joke giving the warriors an adult rating.

Romero · Post by **Romero** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 5:18 pm

I think it would be a 15 since it has loadsa swearing!

KillerMime · Post by **KillerMime** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:01 pm

I think it would be a pg-13 today. The violence is comic book style, no sex, really no blood.

prozium · Post by **prozium** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 6:14 pm

I think here it'd go for a 15 rating due tot he swearing and violence, in the US I can see it getting a PG-13 but since they swear a bit they'll slap an R rating on it. Silly US rules.

Si-Lee-Warrior · Post by **Si-Lee-Warrior** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 8:24 pm

because of repeated swearing, i dont think it would ever come under a 15

X Furie X · Post by **X Furie X** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 9:36 pm

Well, If you look at SouthPark The Movie, That has no violence in, But a heck load of swearing, Yet it only gets a 15 here in Britain, So the Warriors should be a 15 or a 18 due to violence + swearing.

Furies4life · Post by **Furies4life** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:13 pm

I think here in the US it would get PG-13.

ajaxman · Post by **ajaxman** » Thu Jan 12, 2006 11:31 pm

nah it would be rated R for language. The use of the F word by Ajax would be enough to push it to R that and the "Graphic Violence" that they would see the fight scenes as. Darn MPAA and their puritan code.

FcFAjax · Post by **FcFAjax** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:22 am

i believe if a movie says the F word more than 5 times ina movie it has to be classified at 18A. dont quote me on that, but yeah i wouldnt rate it anything over pg13 for anything but the language

the saracens · Post by **the saracens** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 6:47 am

well iv not seen the film but my mum/mom has no problem with me buying the film. (im 13)

zubi q · Post by **zubi q** » Fri Jan 13, 2006 11:25 am

12 because of swearing, nothing harmful!

CalabreseBoy · Post by **CalabreseBoy** » Mon Jan 16, 2006 12:53 am

i doubt it would be only pg, not with all the swearing and the scene where ajaz is trying to rape the girl in the park? itd have to be at least M15 or in extreme maybe even MA15+

Sycamore · Post by **Sycamore** » Tue Jan 17, 2006 4:25 am

I'm 15 and it was pretty mild compared to other films i've seen, i'd give it PG13, but knowing how parents are these days with ratings probably M15+

But defiently in my mind anyone over 13 could watch it.

the wigan warrior · Post by **the wigan warrior** » Sun Mar 05, 2006 4:53 pm

isnt the directors cut a 15? cause i saw a warriors DVD the other day and that was a 15

The Warriors Movie Site Forum

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

certified 18

Re: certified 18